If a compliance software costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a high price?
The answer is dependent on what it replaces.
Automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of tedious work, then $12,000 could be an investment worth it. The calculation would be different when a team of seven people could collect similar evidence in only the time of a few minutes every month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking what platform comes with the most features. Find out what features bring your company savings in time and work.
Automated Manufacturing is a Break-Even Point
Compliance automation isn’t inherently either good or negative. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has multiple cloud environments and multiple applications. The strain of manually gathering evidence over time could become extremely high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence are able to justify their costs.
Think about a company with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. It might have a smaller infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be handled with minimal automation.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide large capabilities, but those capabilities can only provide financial value in the event that an organization really requires these capabilities.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Looking for Vanta and Drata quickly turns into a feature-by -feature task. It is important to compare the features, services and contracts offered by both platforms. Both are reputable compliance platforms that focus on integrations and automation.
You’ll need to make a decision on an additional thing before you do. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same format.
Many well-known Vanta competitors are in competition that is centered around automation. There are also smaller platforms based on management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. Created by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It gives editable policies and evidence guidelines, and permits auditors to look over evidence by gaining restricted access.
It does not set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers choose and upload the proof they wish to submit.
The System Access consideration in the Making
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence by hand.
It also gets rid of integration setup and ensures that the compliance software does not require constant connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. It is important to ask which choices are best for your company.
CertAssist is targeted at companies that comprise between five and 200 people and offers pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The initial price is $225 per month, which is comparable to the usual price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Take Its Rightful Place
What a 10-person start-up needs today might not be the same at 100 or even 500 employees.
Compliance can be managed with a simple platform. As the amount of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increases, economics may eventually favor more automation. This is a better way to purchase compliance technology and let complexity take its place.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations because they look attractive in the comparison chart. They are worth paying for as the work they take over is more costly than manually performing them.